Encounter dossier · Suffolk
The black thing in the churches
A storm crossed Suffolk, the churches darkened, and a black creature was reported among the people. The old explanation is plain. The nature of the visitor is not.
- Date
- 4 August 1577
- Location
- Bungay and Blythburgh, Suffolk
- Record type
- Contemporary account
- Entry type
- Historical church account
- Principal source
- A straunge and terrible wunder
- Names and aliases
- Bungay black dog · Black Shuck (later identification)
- Reported behaviour
- Dangerous
- Source status
- Same-year printed account
- Identification
- Later identified as Shuck
- Status
- Primary text inspected · 12 August 2026
01
The Encounter
Between nine and ten on Sunday morning, 4 August 1577, violent rain, lightning and thunder came over Bungay. The congregation was at service in the parish church, now known as St Mary’s. Fleming says the building seemed to quake and that the darkness became so complete that one person could not make out another except when lightning showed through it.
In that darkness, the account says, a dog-shaped presence of black colour ran down the body of the church. It passed between two people at prayer, who died where they knelt. Another man was seized across the back and left drawn together, though Fleming says he lived. A clerk clearing the gutter was struck down by thunder and escaped further harm.
The pamphlet then turns to Blythburgh on the same day. A thing of the same shape is said to have appeared upon the beam where the rood had once stood, swept down through the church, killed two men and a boy, burned another person’s hand and left others blasted. The account links the two churches. It does not describe a journey along the road between them.
02 / Historical context
First recorded account
Abraham Fleming’s pamphlet was printed in London in 1577, the year of the storm. It is therefore early evidence, but it is not a witness statement. Fleming says that he received the order of events and committed it to paper. The title likewise says the work was drawn into plain method from a written copy.
He was a Protestant religious writer and made the event serve as a warning of divine judgement. His repeated movement between report and sermon matters. The black dog belongs to what he says was reported. The conclusion that it was the Devil belongs to Fleming’s interpretation.
“a dog as they might discerne it, of a black colour”
Fleming, “The reporte of a straunge and wonderful Spectacle,” 1577
03
What the record supports
- A severe storm and a black dog-shaped presence are reported in a pamphlet printed in the same year.
- The pamphlet gives a date, a time window, two churches and distinct reports of death, injury and damage.
- Bungay and Blythburgh are joined by Fleming as events of the same day, but the two church accounts remain distinct.
- Fleming says his material came from a written copy and from those reported to be eyewitnesses. He does not identify those people by name.
04
Later accounts and changes
The creature has grown more definite with repetition. Fleming calls it a dog of black colour and then interprets it as the Devil in that likeness. He gives no size and no description of its eyes. He does not use the name Black Shuck.
Marks upon the stones and church door, together with damage to the clockwork, are not modern inventions. Fleming himself offered them as proof. Their presence in the early pamphlet establishes the age of the claim, not the cause or present identity of any surviving marks.
Black colour
Fleming, 1577
Present in the early accountClaw or talon marks
Fleming, 1577
Present as Fleming’s asserted proofBlack Shuck name
Not in Fleming, 1577
Later identificationGlowing or red eyes
Not in Fleming, 1577
Later addition to be tracedEnormous size
Not in Fleming, 1577
Later addition to be tracedA road journey between churches
Not described by Fleming
Later narrative joining05 / Source audit
How this record was checked
These are the checks behind the dossier. They show what was inspected, what it establishes and where caution is still needed.
The 1577 pamphlet text
The Oxford Text Archive record and its public-domain electronic text identify Fleming, the 1577 publication date, the written copy behind his account and the black dog wording.
The dossier treats this as a same-year printed report, not as Fleming's own eyewitness statement.The Bungay and Blythburgh passages
The two church events occur in the same pamphlet and on the same day, but Fleming does not describe the creature travelling along the road between them.
The archive keeps the church accounts connected but does not invent a journey from one place to the other.The creature's recorded appearance
Fleming gives a dog-shaped presence of black colour. He supplies no eye colour, glow, measurement or comparison of size, and does not use the name Black Shuck.
Red eyes, gigantic size and the familiar name are marked as later additions or identifications.Modern historical work
Christian Owen's peer-reviewed study confirms the pamphlet's religious purpose and places the report within Bungay's local tensions and Reformation setting.
Fleming's claim that the visitor was the Devil is presented as his interpretation, not as the archive's conclusion.06 / Sources
Sources for this encounter
The primary text and its repository record have been inspected. The surviving pamphlet is unpaginated, so the named section and institutional identifiers are used as the dependable locator.
A straunge and terrible wunder
Abraham Fleming, A straunge and terrible wunder wrought very late in the parish church of Bongay. London: Frauncis Godly, 1577. STC 11050.
Unpaginated. See “The reporte of a straunge and wonderful Spectacle.” Surviving copy: British Library C.27.a.4.
- Held or supplied by
- Oxford Text Archive · ota:A00943
- Rights note
- Original work is public domain. OTA electronic text is released as CC0. Page-image terms are separate.
The Black Dog of Bungay
Christian Owen, “The Black Dog of Bungay: Religious Conflict and Supernatural Terror in a Suffolk Parish,” Journal of Religious History 48 (2024), 393–408.
Especially 405–407 for the parish setting, Fleming’s purpose and the 1577 account.
- Held or supplied by
- University of Cambridge Apollo repository
- Rights note
- Open-access article, CC BY 4.0.
Abraham Fleming: writer, cleric and preacher
Clare Elizabeth Painting Stubbs, Abraham Fleming: Writer, Cleric and Preacher in Elizabethan and Jacobean London. PhD thesis, Royal Holloway, University of London, 2011.
Chapter 2, “A Straunge and Terrible Wunder (1577),” 37–61; transcription supplement from British Library C.27.a.4.
- Held or supplied by
- Royal Holloway research repository
- Rights note
- Repository copy consulted for research. No page image is reproduced here.
