01

Encounter dossier · Suffolk

The black thing in the churches

A storm crossed Suffolk, the churches darkened, and a black creature was reported among the people. The old explanation is plain. The nature of the visitor is not.

Date
4 August 1577
Location
Bungay and Blythburgh, Suffolk
Record type
Contemporary account
Entry type
Historical church account
Names and aliases
Bungay black dog · Black Shuck (later identification)
Reported behaviour
Dangerous
Source status
Same-year printed account
Identification
Later identified as Shuck
Status
Primary text inspected · 12 August 2026

01

The Encounter

Between nine and ten on Sunday morning, 4 August 1577, violent rain, lightning and thunder came over Bungay. The congregation was at service in the parish church, now known as St Mary’s. Fleming says the building seemed to quake and that the darkness became so complete that one person could not make out another except when lightning showed through it.

In that darkness, the account says, a dog-shaped presence of black colour ran down the body of the church. It passed between two people at prayer, who died where they knelt. Another man was seized across the back and left drawn together, though Fleming says he lived. A clerk clearing the gutter was struck down by thunder and escaped further harm.

The pamphlet then turns to Blythburgh on the same day. A thing of the same shape is said to have appeared upon the beam where the rood had once stood, swept down through the church, killed two men and a boy, burned another person’s hand and left others blasted. The account links the two churches. It does not describe a journey along the road between them.

02 / Historical context

First recorded account

Abraham Fleming’s pamphlet was printed in London in 1577, the year of the storm. It is therefore early evidence, but it is not a witness statement. Fleming says that he received the order of events and committed it to paper. The title likewise says the work was drawn into plain method from a written copy.

He was a Protestant religious writer and made the event serve as a warning of divine judgement. His repeated movement between report and sermon matters. The black dog belongs to what he says was reported. The conclusion that it was the Devil belongs to Fleming’s interpretation.

a dog as they might discerne it, of a black colour

Fleming, “The reporte of a straunge and wonderful Spectacle,” 1577

03

What the record supports

  • A severe storm and a black dog-shaped presence are reported in a pamphlet printed in the same year.
  • The pamphlet gives a date, a time window, two churches and distinct reports of death, injury and damage.
  • Bungay and Blythburgh are joined by Fleming as events of the same day, but the two church accounts remain distinct.
  • Fleming says his material came from a written copy and from those reported to be eyewitnesses. He does not identify those people by name.
QuestionEarliest recordReading
Date and hourSunday 4 August 1577, between nine and ten in the morningStated by Fleming
AppearanceA visible dog-shaped presence of black colourStated by Fleming
EyesNo colour, glow, number or unusual form describedNot stated
SizeNo measurement or comparison of sizeNot stated
Bungay effectsTwo deaths, one injured survivor, one clerk knocked down without further harmReported by Fleming
Blythburgh effectsTwo men and a boy killed, one burned hand, others described as blastedReported by Fleming
Physical marksDamage to stones, door and clockwork offered as proofClaim made by Fleming
Name usedBlack dog; the Devil in such a likenessBlack Shuck is not used

04

Later accounts and changes

The creature has grown more definite with repetition. Fleming calls it a dog of black colour and then interprets it as the Devil in that likeness. He gives no size and no description of its eyes. He does not use the name Black Shuck.

Marks upon the stones and church door, together with damage to the clockwork, are not modern inventions. Fleming himself offered them as proof. Their presence in the early pamphlet establishes the age of the claim, not the cause or present identity of any surviving marks.

Black colour

Fleming, 1577

Present in the early account

Claw or talon marks

Fleming, 1577

Present as Fleming’s asserted proof

Black Shuck name

Not in Fleming, 1577

Later identification

Glowing or red eyes

Not in Fleming, 1577

Later addition to be traced

Enormous size

Not in Fleming, 1577

Later addition to be traced

A road journey between churches

Not described by Fleming

Later narrative joining

05 / Source audit

How this record was checked

These are the checks behind the dossier. They show what was inspected, what it establishes and where caution is still needed.

The 1577 pamphlet text

The Oxford Text Archive record and its public-domain electronic text identify Fleming, the 1577 publication date, the written copy behind his account and the black dog wording.

The dossier treats this as a same-year printed report, not as Fleming's own eyewitness statement.

The Bungay and Blythburgh passages

The two church events occur in the same pamphlet and on the same day, but Fleming does not describe the creature travelling along the road between them.

The archive keeps the church accounts connected but does not invent a journey from one place to the other.

The creature's recorded appearance

Fleming gives a dog-shaped presence of black colour. He supplies no eye colour, glow, measurement or comparison of size, and does not use the name Black Shuck.

Red eyes, gigantic size and the familiar name are marked as later additions or identifications.

Modern historical work

Christian Owen's peer-reviewed study confirms the pamphlet's religious purpose and places the report within Bungay's local tensions and Reformation setting.

Fleming's claim that the visitor was the Devil is presented as his interpretation, not as the archive's conclusion.

06 / Sources

Sources for this encounter

The primary text and its repository record have been inspected. The surviving pamphlet is unpaginated, so the named section and institutional identifiers are used as the dependable locator.

01 / Primary accountInspected

A straunge and terrible wunder

Abraham Fleming, A straunge and terrible wunder wrought very late in the parish church of Bongay. London: Frauncis Godly, 1577. STC 11050.

Unpaginated. See “The reporte of a straunge and wonderful Spectacle.” Surviving copy: British Library C.27.a.4.

Held or supplied by
Oxford Text Archive · ota:A00943
Rights note
Original work is public domain. OTA electronic text is released as CC0. Page-image terms are separate.
Open the source record
02 / Modern scholarly studyInspected

The Black Dog of Bungay

Christian Owen, “The Black Dog of Bungay: Religious Conflict and Supernatural Terror in a Suffolk Parish,” Journal of Religious History 48 (2024), 393–408.

Especially 405–407 for the parish setting, Fleming’s purpose and the 1577 account.

Held or supplied by
University of Cambridge Apollo repository
Rights note
Open-access article, CC BY 4.0.
Open the source record
03 / Author and printing contextInspected

Abraham Fleming: writer, cleric and preacher

Clare Elizabeth Painting Stubbs, Abraham Fleming: Writer, Cleric and Preacher in Elizabethan and Jacobean London. PhD thesis, Royal Holloway, University of London, 2011.

Chapter 2, “A Straunge and Terrible Wunder (1577),” 37–61; transcription supplement from British Library C.27.a.4.

Held or supplied by
Royal Holloway research repository
Rights note
Repository copy consulted for research. No page image is reproduced here.
Open the source record